Some open-source voice-chat/whiteboard packages

A while back I participated in an online audio conference as part of the open-education group that was facilitated using vClass by Elluminate. I had used the software before and each time been very impressed with how well it works. But given that the focus of this group is ‘open source’ as it applies to educational content, someone very astutely commented that we should be looking for an open source alternative to vClass to support this group’s work. This comment really stuck with me, also because a number of institutions in B.C. have been investigating possible solutions to facilitate synchronous online classes, and ending up with some fairly pricey solutions.

Continue reading “Some open-source voice-chat/whiteboard packages”

Wiki Is Not Your Blog

As recently as yesterday (in this article on Blogs as a CMS by Dr. John Baggaley of Athabasca) I’ve seen people equate blogs and wikis (cf. ‘a new variant of the blog—known as a “wiki”‘). Well, they simply aren’t the same thing. Sure, they both provide ‘easy’ ways of creating web content. They both started to get hyped around the same time, and you can find more and more software that either combines both types of functionalities or provides feeds from one to the other. But if this particular author had actually read the source he was citing (http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/emerging/default.html) he would have seen that they weren’t being equated, simply mentioned (as is now often the case) in the same breath as new “Environments for On-line Collaboration”.

It’s not really fair to pick on this particular author, as these two different phenomenom are more and more being conflated. But it highlights for me why the seemingly interminable blogging about blogging (and I suppose wiki’ing about wiki’ing) is still so prevalent – there isn’t necessarily a deep understanding yet about these phenomenom, and regardless of recent articles that make these technologies seem widespread in their adoption, we are still very much in the early adopters phase if we look at the internet’s population as a whole. </rant> – SWL

RSS for Job Postings

Tim Bray’s recent piece RSS: Promise and Peril lists a number of potentail applications for RSS. Here’s another one that’s a bit of a personal crusade – job postings!

Is this not obvious to anyone else? Well apparently not to most HR departments, many of the ones I have to deal with will not accept anything but hand delivered paper resumes and only got dragged kicking and screaming on to the net a few years back! Maybe it just seems obvious to me as I spend more time now looking at potential employers’ job openings sites. But wouldn’t it be pretty straightforward at the bottom of your (regularly refreshed on a chronological basis, hint hint) job postings page to place a link to an RSS feed? Not only could it then be aggregated together with other postings at more central sites, but individual job seekers who are specifically interested in *your* company, as opposed to just any old company, could actively be pushed potential openings. You’d think reaching people who are already interested in your firm might be a good thing. But perhpas I simply don’t understand the hiring game well enough. – SWL

What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation

Back in April, before I went on holiday, I had posted a few items relating to hyperlink types as well as reputation management. These were partly in response to some of the conversations that were emerging in regards to using technologies like trackback with learning objects, and alternative mechanisms for rating learning objects.

Via a suggestion from Michelle Lamberson at UBC comes a link to this paper, which takes as its starting point the work done in library science on citation analysis but then tries to “differentiat[e] between creation motivations for links in academic Web sites and citations in journals on the basis that they are very different phenomenom.” Interesting to me if only for the list of citations which reveal a set of sources previously unknown to me. – SWL

The Virtues of Virtual – ACM interview with Abbe Mowshowitz

From Ubiquity, a journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, an interview with Abbe Mowshowitz, the person generally credited with originating the term ‘virtual organization.’ Anyone in the workplace during the past 15 years will recognize the forces he is describing. More freightening, yet IMHO no less accurate , is the future he describes, one of ‘virtual feudalism’ where 

“Being short of money, central governments will continue to shift responsibility for social programs to local government, without regard to the availability of funds. The US government will reduce grants to the states, without at the same time reducing the states’ responsibilities for health and welfare. The states in turn will have revenue shortages, and shift the responsibilities to the counties, cities and local communities. The local communities will be stuck with the burdens but they won’t have the funds or the taxing authority to handle the problems. This shift is just one implication of the growing shortage of government revenues accompanying fundamental changes in the political economy. Resources are being placed out of reach and government is playing a shell game. In the near term, probably nobody will pick up the slack. That means reduced funding for education, for health insurance or for programs like Medicaid and Medicare. More people in the United States will fall outside the scope of these programs and there will be a higher proportion of people without educational opportunities, without medical insurance, and without pension plans. As in earlier periods of history, people will turn to private enterprise to ensure their welfare and security, and the authority of government will diminish.“

Sound familiar? 

See also excerpts from his book, Virtual Organization: Toward a Theory of Societal Transformation Stimulated by Information Technology at http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/book/a_mowshowitz_2.html. – SWL

Making instructional content more accessible

“EASI, (Equal Access to Software and Information), is offering a new series, cosponsored by WCET, of synchronous 60-90-minute online events on how to make online instructional content more accessible for learners with disabilities. The series is free to WCET members.”

A post from my colleagues at WCET – if you are in the States there is a fair chance you are a WCET member, and I recommend the courses offered by the EASI folks. – SWL

– via [Edutools News: Course Management Systems]