{"id":307,"date":"2003-10-16T09:01:44","date_gmt":"2003-10-16T17:01:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.edtechpost.ca\/wordpress\/2003\/10\/16\/two-paths-to-interoperable-metadata\/"},"modified":"2003-10-16T09:01:44","modified_gmt":"2003-10-16T17:01:44","slug":"two-paths-to-interoperable-metadata","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wordpress\/2003\/10\/16\/two-paths-to-interoperable-metadata\/","title":{"rendered":"Two Paths to Interoperable Metadata"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.oclc.org\/research\/publications\/archive\/2003\/godby-dc2003.pdf\">http:\/\/www.oclc.org\/research\/publications\/<br \/>\narchive\/2003\/godby-dc2003.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It used to seem that the problem we had was not having enough metadata. Now it is becoming clearer that not only do we have a lot of existing metadata, we have a lot of competing metadata standards and schemas &#8211; different ways of describing what are either the same or similar objects.<\/p>\n<p>This paper, presented at the recent 2003 Dublin Core conference, proposes one (in fact two) model to translate between this proliferation of schemas in order to present users with a unified search interface to diverse collections tagged with different metadata schema.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe approach advocates the need to decouple syntactic transforms from semantic mappings through the creation of a web services-based &#8220;repository of crosswalks&#8221; &#8211; essentially a database of equivalencies between the schemas elements created by human experts. Translations between schemas would be facilitated through the notion of an &#8216;interoperable core,&#8217; a set of core elements that had been mapped to the equivalent elements in the various schema.<\/p>\n<p>It would seem like such an approach is stepping into the territory claimed by RDF, but the authors counter this approach with in one line: &#8220;We believe that the interoperable core could be implemented in RDF, but our experience has led us to conclude that RDF representations introduce unnecessary processing bottlenecks.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The paper ends by exploring the suitability of any existing schema as <b>the<\/b> &#8216;interoperable core&#8217; and concludes that there may be multiple cores, depending on whether one is trying to translate within one &#8220;community of practice&#8217;s&#8221; schemas (e.g. the library world, with its MARC, EAD or ONIX) or between different community&#8217;s schemas (e.g. between the community of learning object developer&#8217;s LOM and the librarians MARC). &#8211; <i>SWL<\/i><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; via [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.resourceshelf.com\/\">ResourceShelf<\/a>] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>http:\/\/www.oclc.org\/research\/publications\/ archive\/2003\/godby-dc2003.pdf It used to seem that the problem we had was not having enough metadata. Now it is becoming clearer that not only do we have a lot of existing metadata, we have a lot of competing metadata standards and schemas &#8211; different ways of describing what are either the same or similar objects. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wordpress\/2003\/10\/16\/two-paths-to-interoperable-metadata\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Two Paths to Interoperable Metadata&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[236,396],"class_list":["post-307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-elearning-standards","tag-metadata","tag-standards"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=307"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottleslie.ca\/edtechpost\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}